HostRAIN vs LAVA — price, size and safety, side by side
RAIN (Arbitrum) vs LAVA (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
RAIN vs LAVA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| RAIN | LAVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008945 | $0.01231 |
| Market cap | $7.28B | $8.18M |
| 24h volume | $1.06M DEX | $13.56K DEX |
| Liquidity | $347.29K | $331.36K |
| FDV | $11.73B | $2.75M |
| Holders | 173,867 | 4,745 |
| Age (days) | 355 | 286 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- RAIN measures ~890× the market cap of LAVA
- RAIN measures ~78× the 24h volume of LAVA
- RAIN measures ~37× the holder count of LAVA
- over the shared window RAIN moved −36.7% while LAVA moved −10.1%
What the data says
RAIN
RAIN is a mid-cap token on Arbitrum trading on real depth: the contract 0x25118290e6a5f4139381d072181157035864099d is what our scan tracks, with $347 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026.
The honest note is about verifiability rather than the project: tokens in this tier have shallow public documentation, and our scan's read is primarily on-chain — the pool is real and functional, but verify the project's identity and contract ownership through its official channels before treating the liquidity as endorsement. Arbitrum hosts a long tail of tokens that look similar in a scan.
LAVA
LAVA at 0x11e969e9b3f89cb16d686a03cd8508c9fc0361af is an Arbitrum deployment of the Lava Network token, 286 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $8.2 million market cap sits above the $2.8 million fully-diluted figure priced on 203.4 million local units.
The local book is workable against the slice: $331.4 thousand of tracked depth on $23.3 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that can take exits and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RAIN or LAVA?
By tracked market cap: RAIN (Arbitrum) measures $7.28B and LAVA (Arbitrum) measures $8.18M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RAIN or LAVA?
On the contract checks we publish: RAIN (Arbitrum) grades B and LAVA (Arbitrum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RAIN and LAVA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show RAIN at −36.7% and LAVA at −10.1%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.