HostRDNT vs GRT — price, size and safety, side by side
RDNT (Arbitrum) vs GRT (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
RDNT vs GRT — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| RDNT | GRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0005408 | $0.02465 |
| Market cap | $894.13K | $291.13M |
| 24h volume | $49.86K DEX | $27.27K DEX |
| Liquidity | $73.56K | $119.49K |
| FDV | $601.67K | $287.38M |
| Holders | 101,328 | 172,259 |
| Age (days) | 1,216 | 1,813 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- GRT measures ~326× the market cap of RDNT
- GRT measures ~1.6× the liquidity of RDNT
- RDNT measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of GRT
- GRT measures ~1.7× the holder count of RDNT
- over the shared window RDNT moved +16.6% while GRT moved −14.1%
What the data says
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The October 9, 2026 snapshot prices a $894.1 thousand market cap across 101,328 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $73.6 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
GRT
GRT — 0xc944e90c64b2c07662a292be6244bdf05cda44a7 — is The Graph's work token, the asset indexers stake and delegators bond to secure the indexing layer a large share of DeFi queries run through. Five years old, it is infrastructure by tenure as much as by function.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $291.1 million market cap — FDV sits at $309.9 million, so supply is essentially fully circulating — with 172,259 holders and $119.5 thousand of tracked depth on the venues this ledger prices. The day is strong: +14.1%.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RDNT or GRT?
By tracked market cap: RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $894.13K and GRT (Ethereum) measures $291.13M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RDNT or GRT?
On the contract checks we publish: RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C and GRT (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RDNT and GRT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show RDNT at +16.6% and GRT at −14.1%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.