HostRNT vs LINK — price, size and safety, side by side
RNT (Polygon) vs LINK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-17.
RNT vs LINK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| RNT | LINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3372 | $12.27 |
| Market cap | $43.74M | $9.53B |
| 24h volume | $15.04K DEX | $1.95M DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.20M | $19.94M |
| FDV | $62.44M | $12.74B |
| Holders | 4,666 | 922,570 |
| Age (days) | 1,064 | 1,745 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- LINK measures ~218× the market cap of RNT
- LINK measures ~9.1× the liquidity of RNT
- LINK measures ~129× the 24h volume of RNT
- LINK measures ~198× the holder count of RNT
- over the shared window RNT moved +7.89% while LINK moved −3.35%
What the data says
RNT
RNT at 0x27ab6e82f3458edbc0703db2756391b899ce6324 — the Reental Utility Token — is a long-running Polygon asset: 1,064 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $43.7 million market cap with a $62.4 million fully-diluted figure on 199.8 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is one of the healthier shapes in this index: $2.2 million of tracked depth is deep relative to the cap, though the $15.0 thousand daily volume is quiet — an asset held more than it is flipped. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority question belongs to the live scan.
LINK
LINK is Chainlink's token — the asset that pays the oracle network most of DeFi runs on, making it one of the few crypto tokens tied to infrastructure the market actually uses every block. The deployment 0x514910771af9ca656af840dff83e8264ecf986ca is the canonical mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $19.9 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a fraction of a float spread across every venue that lists it.
The honest shape: LINK's value thesis is payment for oracle services plus stake in the network's security model, so it carries a real-usage floor most tokens lack — and a valuation that has always run ahead of the fees the network actually collects. It is infrastructure exposure, not a cashflow claim, and the gap between "most-used oracle" and "token captures that usage" is the open question its holders are betting on.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RNT or LINK?
By tracked market cap: RNT (Polygon) measures $43.74M and LINK (Ethereum) measures $9.53B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RNT or LINK?
On the contract checks we publish: RNT (Polygon) grades B and LINK (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RNT and LINK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show RNT at +7.89% and LINK at −3.35%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.