HostRUSH vs NOS — price, size and safety, side by side
RUSH (Solana) vs NOS (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
RUSH vs NOS — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| RUSH | NOS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $73.61 | $0.5186 |
| Market cap | $1.92M | $43.81M |
| 24h volume | $80.60K DEX | $326.56K DEX |
| Liquidity | $489.18K | $479.71K |
| FDV | $1.92M | $43.81M |
| Holders | 2,064 | 49,502 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- NOS measures ~23× the market cap of RUSH
- NOS measures ~4.1× the 24h volume of RUSH
- NOS measures ~24× the holder count of RUSH
- over the shared window RUSH moved +32.8% while NOS moved +85.3%
What the data says
RUSH
Sat Rush — ticker RUSH — is a mid-cap Solana token at mint SATqS9DYpLQsM2z51P4QCoqJRHa5wboV4qjJerJRUSH. The October 6, 2026 snapshot records about $489 thousand of liquidity, a market capitalization near $2 million, and roughly 2,064 holders.
The honest read here is mostly arithmetic. The liquidity-to-cap ratio — about 4% — is healthy for a token of this size, meaning the market supports modest trades without huge slippage. The holder count is modest, which means ownership is still concentrated enough that a handful of wallets could matter to price if they moved together.
NOS
NOS is Nosana — a decentralized GPU compute network on Solana, matching idle GPU supply with AI inference demand. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $43.8 million across 49,502 wallets on mint nosXBVoaCTtYdLvKY6Csb4AC8JCdQKKAaWYtx2ZMoo7.
Nosana is a real DePIN thesis: distributed GPU capacity sold to AI workloads, settled on-chain. The token's value tracks whether that marketplace wins inference volume against centralized GPU clouds and rival DePIN networks — an actual competitive question, which makes it priced on fundamentals as much as narrative.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RUSH or NOS?
By tracked market cap: RUSH (Solana) measures $1.92M and NOS (Solana) measures $43.81M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RUSH or NOS?
On the contract checks we publish: RUSH (Solana) grades A and NOS (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RUSH and NOS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show RUSH at +32.8% and NOS at +85.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.