HostSASHIMI vs EUROC — price, size and safety, side by side
SASHIMI (Ethereum) vs EUROC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
SASHIMI vs EUROC — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| SASHIMI | EUROC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001303 | $1.12 |
| Market cap | $31.44K | $489.98M |
| 24h volume | $49.05M DEX | $6.75M DEX |
| Liquidity | $6.04M | $5.75M |
| FDV | $31.44K | $357.60M |
| Holders | 2,468 | 27,010 |
| Age (days) | 1,164 | 458 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- EUROC measures ~15,586× the market cap of SASHIMI
- SASHIMI measures ~7.3× the 24h volume of EUROC
- EUROC measures ~11× the holder count of SASHIMI
- over the shared window SASHIMI moved −100.0% while EUROC moved −3.36%
What the data says
SASHIMI
Sashimi is a survivor of the 2020 food-coin summer — a DEX token from the yield-farming era when naming a protocol after lunch was a growth strategy — and unlike almost all of its cohort it still shows a working market. Our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $6 million of tracked pool liquidity at contract 0xc28e27870558cf22add83540d2126da2e4b464c2, against about $49 million of recorded daily volume — turnover near thirty percent, which says the depth is actually being used rather than just parked.
The honest complication is what a six-year-old food token's depth is made of. Legacy DeFi tokens often carry a few large, sticky LPs rather than broad organic flow, and "deep and old" can look identical to "deep and alive" at snapshot resolution. What this capture did not do is open the contract — SASHIMI's mint controls, owner functions and any transfer mechanics are unexamined here, and on a legacy token the live scanner above is the check that reads them directly.
EUROC
EUROC is Circle's euro — the EUR sibling of USDC, issued under the same regulated-reserve structure but denominated in the currency most of the world actually settles in. The deployment 0x1abaea1f7c830bd89acc67ec4af516284b1bc33c is the Ethereum mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $5.8 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest note: EUROC's risk profile is identical to USDC's in kind (Circle's attestations, freeze controls, issuer solvency) and smaller in scale — the euro-stablecoin market has always been a fraction of the dollar's, which means thinner liquidity and higher FX-peg slippage when size moves. For EUR-denominated DeFi it's the credible option; the depth gap to dollar stables is structural, not a verdict on quality.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SASHIMI or EUROC?
By tracked market cap: SASHIMI (Ethereum) measures $31.44K and EUROC (Ethereum) measures $489.98M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SASHIMI or EUROC?
On the contract checks we publish: SASHIMI (Ethereum) grades B and EUROC (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SASHIMI and EUROC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show SASHIMI at −100.0% and EUROC at −3.36%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.