HostSASHIMI vs STLINK — price, size and safety, side by side
SASHIMI (Ethereum) vs STLINK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
SASHIMI vs STLINK — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| SASHIMI | STLINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001303 | $12.67 |
| Market cap | $31.44K | $98.68M |
| 24h volume | $49.05M DEX | $1.03M DEX |
| Liquidity | $6.04M | $5.38M |
| FDV | $31.44K | $98.68M |
| Holders | 2,468 | 1,857 |
| Age (days) | 1,164 | 513 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- STLINK measures ~3,139× the market cap of SASHIMI
- SASHIMI measures ~47× the 24h volume of STLINK
- over the shared window SASHIMI moved −100.0% while STLINK moved +11.0%
What the data says
SASHIMI
Sashimi is a survivor of the 2020 food-coin summer — a DEX token from the yield-farming era when naming a protocol after lunch was a growth strategy — and unlike almost all of its cohort it still shows a working market. Our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $6 million of tracked pool liquidity at contract 0xc28e27870558cf22add83540d2126da2e4b464c2, against about $49 million of recorded daily volume — turnover near thirty percent, which says the depth is actually being used rather than just parked.
The honest complication is what a six-year-old food token's depth is made of. Legacy DeFi tokens often carry a few large, sticky LPs rather than broad organic flow, and "deep and old" can look identical to "deep and alive" at snapshot resolution. What this capture did not do is open the contract — SASHIMI's mint controls, owner functions and any transfer mechanics are unexamined here, and on a legacy token the live scanner above is the check that reads them directly.
STLINK
Staked LINK is LINK deposited into Chainlink's native staking — the token that secures the oracle network's economic guarantees and earns emissions for doing it. The deployment 0xb8b295df2cd735b15be5eb419517aa626fc43cd5 is the staking receipt; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $5.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: stLINK trades LINK's oracle-usage thesis with a staking yield on top and a liquidity discount underneath — the staked form exits slower than the base asset, and the yield is emissions-funded rather than fee-funded, which makes it a bet on the network's token economics holding their value, not on fees it collects.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SASHIMI or STLINK?
By tracked market cap: SASHIMI (Ethereum) measures $31.44K and STLINK (Ethereum) measures $98.68M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SASHIMI or STLINK?
On the contract checks we publish: SASHIMI (Ethereum) grades B and STLINK (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SASHIMI and STLINK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show SASHIMI at −100.0% and STLINK at +11.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.