HostSASHIMI vs USD0++ — price, size and safety, side by side
SASHIMI (Ethereum) vs USD0++ (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
SASHIMI vs USD0++ — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| SASHIMI | USD0++ | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001303 | $0.9747 |
| Market cap | $31.44K | — |
| 24h volume | $49.05M DEX | $4.15 DEX |
| Liquidity | $6.04M | $5.33M |
| FDV | $31.44K | $504.34M |
| Holders | 2,468 | 2,713 |
| Age (days) | 1,164 | 528 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- SASHIMI measures ~11,817,707× the 24h volume of USD0++
- over the shared window SASHIMI moved −100.0% while USD0++ moved +0.66%
What the data says
SASHIMI
Sashimi is a survivor of the 2020 food-coin summer — a DEX token from the yield-farming era when naming a protocol after lunch was a growth strategy — and unlike almost all of its cohort it still shows a working market. Our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $6 million of tracked pool liquidity at contract 0xc28e27870558cf22add83540d2126da2e4b464c2, against about $49 million of recorded daily volume — turnover near thirty percent, which says the depth is actually being used rather than just parked.
The honest complication is what a six-year-old food token's depth is made of. Legacy DeFi tokens often carry a few large, sticky LPs rather than broad organic flow, and "deep and old" can look identical to "deep and alive" at snapshot resolution. What this capture did not do is open the contract — SASHIMI's mint controls, owner functions and any transfer mechanics are unexamined here, and on a legacy token the live scanner above is the check that reads them directly.
USD0++
USD0++ is Usual Protocol's bonded T-bill — the yield-bearing form of its USD0 stablecoin, structured as a liquid bond that locks the underlying for a term and pays boosted yield for the commitment. The deployment 0x35d8949372d46b7a3d5a56006ae77b215fc69bc0 is the mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $5.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: the "++" is duration — USD0++ trades instant redeemability for a locked term in exchange for protocol yield, which means it can and does trade below the dollar value of the USD0 inside it when the market marks that lock-up at a discount. A holder isn't buying a stablecoin; they're buying a bond with a market price.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SASHIMI or USD0++?
By tracked market cap: SASHIMI (Ethereum) measures $31.44K and USD0++ (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SASHIMI or USD0++?
On the contract checks we publish: SASHIMI (Ethereum) grades B and USD0++ (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SASHIMI and USD0++ performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show SASHIMI at −100.0% and USD0++ at +0.66%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.