HostSCUSD vs FIVE — price, size and safety, side by side
SCUSD (Sonic) vs FIVE (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
SCUSD vs FIVE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| SCUSD | FIVE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9943 | $0.0002623 |
| Market cap | $1.92M | $300.88K |
| 24h volume | $5.35K DEX | $2.32K DEX |
| Liquidity | $93.38K | $35.33K |
| FDV | $643.69K | $427.45K |
| Holders | 9,491 | 7,567 |
| Age (days) | 626 | 589 |
| Safety grade | E | C |
Where they differ
- SCUSD measures ~6.4× the market cap of FIVE
- SCUSD measures ~2.6× the liquidity of FIVE
- SCUSD measures ~2.3× the 24h volume of FIVE
- over the shared window SCUSD moved −0.64% while FIVE moved +4.72%
What the data says
SCUSD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on SCUSD to flag. Right now SCUSD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. That's what's holding the score at 39/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Here's where SCUSD stands today: a $93.38K pool, 9,491 wallets holding and 626 days old as of 2026-10-09. The $93.38K pool against a ~$1.92M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 9,491 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SCUSD as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FIVE
The most important thing to know about FIVE is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the trading data, FIVE shows deep liquidity of $35.33K, 7,567 wallets holding and 589 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $300.88K in market cap, the $35.33K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 7,567-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created FIVE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SCUSD or FIVE?
By tracked market cap: SCUSD (Sonic) measures $1.92M and FIVE (Sonic) measures $300.88K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SCUSD or FIVE?
On the contract checks we publish: SCUSD (Sonic) grades E and FIVE (Sonic) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SCUSD and FIVE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show SCUSD at −0.64% and FIVE at +4.72%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.