HostSDAI vs WXDAI — price, size and safety, side by side
SDAI (Gnosis) vs WXDAI (Gnosis) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
SDAI vs WXDAI — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| SDAI | WXDAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.26 | $0.998 |
| Market cap | $42.01M | $44.66M |
| 24h volume | $260.69K DEX | $403.87K DEX |
| Liquidity | $4.93M | $852.73K |
| FDV | $41.95M | $44.58M |
| Holders | 25,480 | 46,329 |
| Age (days) | 151 | 564 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SDAI measures ~5.8× the liquidity of WXDAI
- WXDAI measures ~1.5× the 24h volume of SDAI
- WXDAI measures ~1.8× the holder count of SDAI
What the data says
SDAI
SDAI clears the most important contract test cleanly. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and no pause or blacklist lever exists, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. That leaves SDAI at a healthy 100/100 as of 2026-10-09, with only normal market risk left to price in.
On the trading data, SDAI shows $4.93M of on-chain liquidity, 25,480 wallets holding and a maturing record at 151 days as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $4.93M pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $42.01M — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 25,480 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
WXDAI
WXDAI starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why WXDAI earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
On liquidity and holders, WXDAI shows workable liquidity of $852.73K, a holder base of 46,329 and 564 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $44.66M, the $852.73K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 46,329-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created WXDAI holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SDAI or WXDAI?
By tracked market cap: SDAI (Gnosis) measures $42.01M and WXDAI (Gnosis) measures $44.66M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SDAI or WXDAI?
On the contract checks we publish: SDAI (Gnosis) grades A and WXDAI (Gnosis) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SDAI and WXDAI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show SDAI at +0.34% and WXDAI at +0.05%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.