HostSHADOW vs X33 — price, size and safety, side by side
SHADOW (Sonic) vs X33 (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
SHADOW vs X33 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| SHADOW | X33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.62 | $4.36 |
| Market cap | $1.14M | $1.11M |
| 24h volume | $6.18K DEX | $10.36K DEX |
| Liquidity | $135.74K | $64.17K |
| FDV | $4.60M | $1.11M |
| Holders | 25,045 | 7,538 |
| Age (days) | 629 | 613 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- SHADOW measures ~2.1× the liquidity of X33
- X33 measures ~1.7× the 24h volume of SHADOW
- SHADOW measures ~3.3× the holder count of X33
What the data says
SHADOW
The most important thing to know about SHADOW is its authority setup. Right now SHADOW's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why SHADOW is at C (67/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Here's where SHADOW stands today: $135.74K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 25,045 and an established 629-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $135.74K pool stands up well to a ~$1.14M cap — depth like that means SHADOW absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 25,045 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SHADOW holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
X33
X33 gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. Minting simply isn't in the contract, so dilution isn't on the table, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts X33 at 92/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
By the numbers, X33 is showing $64.17K of on-chain liquidity, 7,538 holders and an established 613-day history as of 2026-10-09. The $64.17K pool stands up well to a ~$1.11M cap — depth like that means X33 absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. 7,538 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHADOW or X33?
By tracked market cap: SHADOW (Sonic) measures $1.14M and X33 (Sonic) measures $1.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHADOW or X33?
On the contract checks we publish: SHADOW (Sonic) grades C and X33 (Sonic) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHADOW and X33 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show SHADOW at +36.3% and X33 at +38.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.