HostSHRAMP vs FLING — price, size and safety, side by side
SHRAMP (Monad) vs FLING (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
SHRAMP vs FLING — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| SHRAMP | FLING | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001801 | $0.000065 |
| Market cap | $215.07K | — |
| 24h volume | $1.77K DEX | $8.27K DEX |
| Liquidity | $20.68K | $14.78K |
| FDV | $215.07K | $113.67K |
| Holders | 3,224 | 496 |
| Age (days) | 306 | 28 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- FLING measures ~4.7× the 24h volume of SHRAMP
- SHRAMP measures ~6.5× the holder count of FLING
- over the shared window SHRAMP moved +11.0% while FLING moved −70.0%
What the data says
SHRAMP
SHRAMP at 0x42a4aa89864a794de135b23c6a8d2e05513d7777 is a Monad community token 291 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, with 3,224 holders sharing a 1.0 billion supply around an $215.1 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution is mid-heavy rather than extreme: the ten largest wallets hold 50.1% of supply. $20.7 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $985 of daily volume — a pool proportionate to the small cap.
FLING
FLING is an early-stage token on Monad — the new high-throughput EVM chain whose token economy is still young. The contract 0xa9da3c77ec7cdc4dfaa1fe142af583543d1c540f is what our scan tracks: $15 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026.
The honest frame for early Monad tokens generally: the chain itself is new, so every asset on it is early-stage by definition — thin pools, fast narratives, and a market that has not sorted winners from launch-week noise yet. Twenty-seven thousand dollars of liquidity is the practical fact: size any position against the pool, not the storyline.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHRAMP or FLING?
By tracked market cap: SHRAMP (Monad) measures $215.07K and FLING (Monad) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHRAMP or FLING?
On the contract checks we publish: SHRAMP (Monad) grades A and FLING (Monad) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHRAMP and FLING performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show SHRAMP at +11.0% and FLING at −70.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.