HostSHRAMP vs NADS — price, size and safety, side by side
SHRAMP (Monad) vs NADS (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
SHRAMP vs NADS — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| SHRAMP | NADS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001801 | $0.00004219 |
| Market cap | $215.07K | $41.53K |
| 24h volume | $1.77K DEX | $811.16 DEX |
| Liquidity | $20.68K | $9.47K |
| FDV | $215.07K | $41.53K |
| Holders | 3,224 | 3,466 |
| Age (days) | 306 | 313 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- SHRAMP measures ~5.2× the market cap of NADS
- SHRAMP measures ~2.2× the liquidity of NADS
- SHRAMP measures ~2.2× the 24h volume of NADS
- over the shared window SHRAMP moved +11.0% while NADS moved +20.3%
What the data says
SHRAMP
SHRAMP at 0x42a4aa89864a794de135b23c6a8d2e05513d7777 is a Monad community token 291 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, with 3,224 holders sharing a 1.0 billion supply around an $215.1 thousand market cap.
The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The distribution is mid-heavy rather than extreme: the ten largest wallets hold 50.1% of supply. $20.7 thousand of deep tracked depth sees $985 of daily volume — a pool proportionate to the small cap.
NADS
NADS takes its name from Monad community slang — "nads" is what the chain's own culture calls its members — making this something like a self-referential mascot token for the Monad ecosystem itself. One billion units, 298 days old, 3,466 holders.
The contract is clean at 85/100: no mint, no pause or blacklist, verified source — the same grade-A template the rest of the Monad batch shows. Market structure is thin but proportionate: $9 thousand of liquidity against a market cap of $42 thousand, roughly four-to-one cap-to-pool, deep enough that routine trades clear without drama.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHRAMP or NADS?
By tracked market cap: SHRAMP (Monad) measures $215.07K and NADS (Monad) measures $41.53K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHRAMP or NADS?
On the contract checks we publish: SHRAMP (Monad) grades A and NADS (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHRAMP and NADS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show SHRAMP at +11.0% and NADS at +20.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.