HostSOLVBTC vs NECT — price, size and safety, side by side
SOLVBTC (Berachain) vs NECT (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
SOLVBTC vs NECT — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| SOLVBTC | NECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.48K | $0.9985 |
| Market cap | $526.73M | $4.44M |
| 24h volume | $49.32 DEX | $16.86K DEX |
| Liquidity | $225.98K | $55.68K |
| FDV | $34.53K | $267.23K |
| Holders | 5,787 | 14,704 |
| Age (days) | 610 | 358 |
| Safety grade | B | E |
Where they differ
- SOLVBTC measures ~119× the market cap of NECT
- SOLVBTC measures ~4.1× the liquidity of NECT
- NECT measures ~342× the 24h volume of SOLVBTC
- NECT measures ~2.5× the holder count of SOLVBTC
- over the shared window SOLVBTC moved −1.14% while NECT moved +6.25%
What the data says
SOLVBTC
There's a small gap on this page — SOLVBTC's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Looking at the market data, SOLVBTC shows a $225.98K pool, 5,787 wallets holding and an established record at 610 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $225.98K pool against roughly $526.73M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. A 5,787-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SOLVBTC holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
NECT
The most important thing to know about NECT is its authority setup. Right now NECT's contract keeps its mint and freeze levers (2026-10-09 snapshot), which means the team can still create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 21/100 (grade E) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
Market-wise, NECT carries workable liquidity of $55.68K, 14,704 holders and a maturing record at 358 days as of 2026-10-09. The $55.68K pool against a ~$4.44M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 14,704 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of NECT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SOLVBTC or NECT?
By tracked market cap: SOLVBTC (Berachain) measures $526.73M and NECT (Berachain) measures $4.44M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SOLVBTC or NECT?
On the contract checks we publish: SOLVBTC (Berachain) grades B and NECT (Berachain) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SOLVBTC and NECT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show SOLVBTC at −1.14% and NECT at +6.25%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.