HostSQD vs WOO — price, size and safety, side by side
SQD (Arbitrum) vs WOO (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
SQD vs WOO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| SQD | WOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.02156 | $0.01135 |
| Market cap | $37.76M | $25.14M |
| 24h volume | $42.85K DEX | $845.49K DEX |
| Liquidity | $192.69K | $593.54K |
| FDV | $38.30M | $25.14M |
| Holders | 17,087 | 19,358 |
| Age (days) | 824 | 374 |
| Safety grade | D | A |
Where they differ
- SQD measures ~1.5× the market cap of WOO
- WOO measures ~3.1× the liquidity of SQD
- WOO measures ~20× the 24h volume of SQD
- over the shared window SQD moved −22.5% while WOO moved −6.20%
What the data says
SQD
SQD at 0x1337420ded5adb9980cfc35f8f2b054ea86f8ab1 — Subsquid — is the Arbitrum deployment of the blockchain data-network token, 809 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $37.8 million market cap prices nearly all of the $38.3 million fully-diluted figure on 1.3 billion units — the float is essentially out.
The book is thin for the cap: $192.7 thousand of tracked depth on $14.9 thousand of 24-hour volume — a held-token profile. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
WOO
WOO is the token of WOO Network — the liquidity network and exchange stack (WOOFi, WOO X) that routes institutional-style execution to retail venues. The contract 0x4691937a7508860f876c9c0a2a617e7d9e945d4b is what our scan tracks: $594 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 6, 2026.
The honest shape: WOO is an exchange-ecosystem token, which means its value case tracks the volumes and staking economics of venues most retail holders will never open an account on — the thesis is B2B plumbing, not a consumer product. It has also been through a real cycle — a senior token that has lived through both the exchange-token mania and the hangover — so the pool here is liquid but the narrative is quieter than it was.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SQD or WOO?
By tracked market cap: SQD (Arbitrum) measures $37.76M and WOO (Ethereum) measures $25.14M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SQD or WOO?
On the contract checks we publish: SQD (Arbitrum) grades D and WOO (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SQD and WOO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show SQD at −22.5% and WOO at −6.20%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.