HostSTONE vs SCR — price, size and safety, side by side
STONE (Scroll) vs SCR (Scroll) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
STONE vs SCR — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| STONE | SCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.59K | $0.02101 |
| Market cap | — | $4.95M |
| 24h volume | $5.33 DEX | $2.62K DEX |
| Liquidity | $29.86K | $11.39K |
| FDV | $1.76M | $26.03M |
| Holders | 50,903 | 132,947 |
| Age (days) | 904 | 717 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- STONE measures ~2.6× the liquidity of SCR
- SCR measures ~492× the 24h volume of STONE
- SCR measures ~2.6× the holder count of STONE
- over the shared window STONE moved +0.24% while SCR moved −19.3%
What the data says
STONE
One thing stands out on STONE, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why STONE is at C (60/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the market side, STONE brings a $29.86K pool, 50,903 holders and an established record at 904 days as of 2026-10-09. Read $29.86K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. 50,903 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created STONE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
SCR
One detail on SCR didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On the market side, SCR brings $11.39K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 132,947 and an established 717-day history as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $11.39K of depth against a market cap of about $4.95M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: SCR reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. With 132,947 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SCR holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, STONE or SCR?
By tracked market cap: STONE (Scroll) measures — and SCR (Scroll) measures $4.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, STONE or SCR?
On the contract checks we publish: STONE (Scroll) grades C and SCR (Scroll) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have STONE and SCR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show STONE at +0.24% and SCR at −19.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.