HostSTS vs FT — price, size and safety, side by side
STS (Sonic) vs FT (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
STS vs FT — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| STS | FT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.06148 | $0.1436 |
| Market cap | $4.64M | $72.17M |
| 24h volume | $25.74K DEX | $25.89K DEX |
| Liquidity | $479.59K | $189.39K |
| FDV | $4.64M | $394.06K |
| Holders | 20,463 | — |
| Age (days) | 641 | 69 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- FT measures ~16× the market cap of STS
- STS measures ~2.5× the liquidity of FT
- over the shared window STS moved +26.7% while FT moved −3.24%
What the data says
STS
There's a small gap on this page — STS's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On the market side, STS brings a $479.59K pool, a holder base of 20,463 and 641 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $4.64M in market cap, the $479.59K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 20,463-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of STS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FT
The most important thing to know about FT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint and freeze levers hasn't been removed, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 41/100 (grade D) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On liquidity and holders, FT shows a $189.39K pool and a young record at 69 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $189.39K pool against roughly $72.17M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of FT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, STS or FT?
By tracked market cap: STS (Sonic) measures $4.64M and FT (Sonic) measures $72.17M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, STS or FT?
On the contract checks we publish: STS (Sonic) grades B and FT (Sonic) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have STS and FT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show STS at +26.7% and FT at −3.24%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.