Open app

SUPER vs QI — price, size and safety, side by side

SUPER (Avalanche) vs QI (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.

SUPERA

$0.1982
SuperVerse on Avalanche
Trade SUPER
vs

QIA

$0.002601
BENQI on Avalanche
Trade QI

SUPER vs QI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22

100 — shared start
SUPER +35.3%  ·  QI +85.0% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
SUPERQI
Price$0.1982$0.002601
Market cap$143.39M$19.92M
24h volume$25.91K DEX$22.54K DEX
Liquidity$415.24K$232.38K
FDV$1.08M$19.92M
Holders4,10839,822
Age (days)4481,838
Safety gradeAA

Where they differ

What the data says

SUPER

SUPER at 0x09fa58228bb791ea355c90da1e4783452b9bd8c3 is the Avalanche deployment of the SuperVerse token — the gaming-ecosystem asset carried here as a bridged book 430 days into its record. The October 9, 2026 snapshot prices the 5.0 million local units at $1.1 million fully diluted, inside the asset-wide $143.4 million market cap — a sliver of the headline float lives on this chain.

The contract is the locked kind: mint and freeze authority are both revoked, the contract cannot create new supply, and it is not a proxy. The local book is small and top-heavy: 4,108 holders with the ten largest wallets at 88.6% of supply, and $415.2 thousand of thin tracked depth on $28.5 thousand of daily volume.

QI

QI at 0x8729438eb15e2c8b576fcc6aecda6a148776c0f5 is BENQI's governance token — Avalanche's original money-market protocol — 1,820 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $19.9 million market cap across a 7.2 billion supply.

The book is workable and the tape alive five years in: $232.4 thousand of tracked depth on $45.8 thousand of 24-hour volume — a real protocol-token pool, not a listing stub. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

FAQ

Which is bigger, SUPER or QI?

By tracked market cap: SUPER (Avalanche) measures $143.39M and QI (Avalanche) measures $19.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, SUPER or QI?

On the contract checks we publish: SUPER (Avalanche) grades A and QI (Avalanche) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have SUPER and QI performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show SUPER at +35.3% and QI at +85.0%.

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.