HostSUSDAI vs GMX — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSDAI (Arbitrum) vs GMX (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
SUSDAI vs GMX — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| SUSDAI | GMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.12 | $8.76 |
| Market cap | $479.95M | $88.38M |
| 24h volume | $1.70M DEX | $132.72K DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.60M | $2.34M |
| FDV | $338.88M | $92.72M |
| Holders | 3,702 | 297,710 |
| Age (days) | 448 | 212 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- SUSDAI measures ~5.4× the market cap of GMX
- SUSDAI measures ~3.2× the liquidity of GMX
- SUSDAI measures ~13× the 24h volume of GMX
- GMX measures ~80× the holder count of SUSDAI
- over the shared window SUSDAI moved +0.21% while GMX moved +11.0%
What the data says
SUSDAI
SUSDAI is the staked wrapper of USDai — the yield-bearing form of a dollar token issued against AI-infrastructure financing — trading on Arbitrum at 0x0b2b2b2076d95dda7817e785989fe353fe955ef9. The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $7.6 million of tracked pool liquidity, the deepest single line item in this slice of the index.
What the numbers say: roughly seven months of trading history behind it, about $2.2 million of 24-hour volume against that liquidity base — a turnover ratio near 12%, the shape of a yield instrument held rather than churned. The ~$1.11 print against a $1-asset wrapper is consistent with accrued staking yield rather than a broken peg, though the snapshot alone cannot separate the two.
GMX
GMX at 0xfc5a1a6eb076a2c7ad06ed22c90d7e710e35ad0a is the governance and fee-share token of the GMX perpetuals exchange on Arbitrum — the asset whose stakers earn a cut of the venue's real trading revenue rather than emissions-funded yield. The October 9, 2026 snapshot prices an $88.4 million market cap on the 11.0 million local units, with the $92.7 million fully-diluted figure sitting barely above the cap — a supply nearly fully emitted, the designed scarcity of a hard-capped exchange token.
The local book at this deployment — 194 days into its recorded history — holds $2.3 million of workable tracked depth on $73.4 thousand of daily volume: a book that does its real turnover across the venue's own GLP markets and sister deployments rather than this slice of pools.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSDAI or GMX?
By tracked market cap: SUSDAI (Arbitrum) measures $479.95M and GMX (Arbitrum) measures $88.38M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSDAI or GMX?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSDAI (Arbitrum) grades B and GMX (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSDAI and GMX performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show SUSDAI at +0.21% and GMX at +11.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.