HostSUSDC-9 vs JUICED — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSDC-9 (Solana) vs JUICED (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
SUSDC-9 vs JUICED — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| SUSDC-9 | JUICED | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9997 | $1.04 |
| Market cap | $63.01K | $51.57M |
| 24h volume | $0.2149 DEX | $2.11M DEX |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $63.01K | $51.57M |
| Holders | 22,901 | 3,660 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JUICED measures ~818× the market cap of SUSDC-9
- JUICED measures ~9,794,665× the 24h volume of SUSDC-9
- SUSDC-9 measures ~6.3× the holder count of JUICED
What the data says
SUSDC-9
SUSDC-9 — "Saber Wrapped USD Coin (9 decimals)" on Solana, mint JEFFSQ3s8T3wKsvp4tnRAsUBW7Cqgnf8ukBZC4C8XBm1 — is a Saber-era remnant: a wrapped-USDC receipt from the legendary Saber AMM, still held across 22,901 wallets and still pegged at $0.9997 in the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
A 63k-unit supply at $63 thousand on a 23k file is archaeology: the wrapped token outlived the protocol's prime. Saber was Solana's dominant stable-swap venue through 2021-22; tokens like this are the wrapper layer that era left behind, still circulating years later.
JUICED
JUICED is the page in this cohort where honesty about limits matters most, so it leads with them: beyond the name its metadata carries, this token doesn't come with a public story our read can verify, and this page won't invent one. What the chain shows at mint 7GxATsNMnaC88vdwd2t3mwrFuQwwGvmYPrUQ4D6FotXk, per HostDeFi's October 6, 2026 snapshot: roughly $51.6 million of represented value held by 3,660 wallets, a freeze authority that reads revoked, and the value-equals-pool signature that characterizes receipt tokens — staking or yield-pool shares whose worth tracks deposits — rather than free-floating traded assets.
That signature shapes how to read everything else. A receipt token's supply expands and contracts with its pool by design, so "can supply grow?" has the same answer as for every liquid-staking token this site grades: yes, mechanically, as the product operating — with the freeze-authority check (passed here) being the one that actually protects holders. The nearly four thousand wallets holding it imply a real user base for whatever the underlying product is, not a treasury parked in a wrapper.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSDC-9 or JUICED?
By tracked market cap: SUSDC-9 (Solana) measures $63.01K and JUICED (Solana) measures $51.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSDC-9 or JUICED?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSDC-9 (Solana) grades A and JUICED (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSDC-9 and JUICED performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show SUSDC-9 at −0.02% and JUICED at +0.55%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.