HostSUSDE vs GOOD — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSDE (Ethereum) vs GOOD (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
SUSDE vs GOOD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| SUSDE | GOOD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.25 | $0.00009699 |
| Market cap | $1.24B | $1.75K |
| 24h volume | $1.49M DEX | $105.16 DEX |
| Liquidity | $26.10M | $1.87K |
| FDV | $1.24B | $82.46K |
| Holders | 12,112 | 1,519 |
| Age (days) | 488 | — |
| Safety grade | E | A |
Where they differ
- SUSDE measures ~707,972× the market cap of GOOD
- SUSDE measures ~13,933× the liquidity of GOOD
- SUSDE measures ~14,191× the 24h volume of GOOD
- SUSDE measures ~8.0× the holder count of GOOD
- over the shared window SUSDE moved +0.90% while GOOD moved −98.0%
What the data says
SUSDE
sUSDe is the yield-bearing half of Ethena's system — USDe locked in the staking contract, accruing the funding-rate and staking yield the delta-neutral hedge generates. That is why it trades above a dollar ($1.24 at our October 6, 2026 read): the price is the receipt appreciating, not a peg. The contract 0x9d39a5de30e57443bff2a8307a4256c8797a3497 is the canonical Ethereum deployment; tracked pool liquidity reads $26.1 million.
The honest mechanics: holding sUSDe means opting into the full Ethena stack — the basis-trade carry (which can go negative), the offshore-exchange custody of the hedge, plus a ~7-day unstaking cooldown on the way out. The cooldown matters in stress: sUSDe can trade at a discount to its accrued value precisely when everyone wants the exit at once. None of this is hypothetical — it is the price of the yield.
GOOD
goodcryptoX — GOOD — the token of a real, running trading-bot app (multi-chain DEX trading tools, sniper/limit-order products). Vanity mint goodX4LG92UAcRdFRUykfP2fAfzQAVttrToEPxtxSkp; the October 6, 2026 snapshot shows about $2 thousand of liquidity and roughly 1,519 holders.
Trading-bot tokens have a legible honesty test: does the product exist and does anyone use it — and goodcryptoX's does. The separate question the scan can't answer is how much of the product's value accrues to the token versus to the company running it; in this category that connection is usually softer than the branding suggests.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSDE or GOOD?
By tracked market cap: SUSDE (Ethereum) measures $1.24B and GOOD (Solana) measures $1.75K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSDE or GOOD?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSDE (Ethereum) grades E and GOOD (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSDE and GOOD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show SUSDE at +0.90% and GOOD at −98.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.