HostSUT vs BAL — price, size and safety, side by side
SUT (Polygon) vs BAL (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
SUT vs BAL — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| SUT | BAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2481 | $0.1209 |
| Market cap | — | $8.50M |
| 24h volume | $19.51K DEX | $934.29 DEX |
| Liquidity | $57.26K | $46.29K |
| FDV | $63.34M | $68.15K |
| Holders | 53,791 | 45,773 |
| Age (days) | 339 | 1,351 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- SUT measures ~21× the 24h volume of BAL
- over the shared window SUT moved −37.6% while BAL moved −0.70%
What the data says
SUT
SUT at 0x98965474ecbec2f532f1f780ee37b0b05f77ca55 — styled "SUPER TRUST" — is a Polygon token 324 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot, which carries no market-cap reading for it. What the snapshot does measure: 53,791 holders across a 238.4 million supply, $57.3 thousand of tracked pool depth, and $31.2 thousand of 24-hour turnover — a modest book on every axis.
The contract read is the strong half: the contract cannot mint new supply, cannot freeze balances, and is not a proxy — grade A on code posture. The distribution read is the counterweight: the ten largest wallets hold 70.8% of supply, so most of the float sits in a few wallets even though the holder count is broad.
BAL
BAL at 0x9a71012b13ca4d3d0cdc72a177df3ef03b0e76a3 — Balancer (PoS) — is the Polygon PoS-bridged deployment of the Balancer protocol's governance asset, 1,351 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $8.5 million market cap dwarfs a $68.1 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 559.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin to the point of a stub: $46.3 thousand of tracked depth on $934 of 24-hour volume — a legacy bridge float with barely any tape. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUT or BAL?
By tracked market cap: SUT (Polygon) measures — and BAL (Polygon) measures $8.50M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUT or BAL?
On the contract checks we publish: SUT (Polygon) grades A and BAL (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUT and BAL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show SUT at −37.6% and BAL at −0.70%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.