HostSWASH vs AURA — price, size and safety, side by side
SWASH (Gnosis) vs AURA (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
SWASH vs AURA — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| SWASH | AURA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0008136 | $0.2737 |
| Market cap | $746.52K | — |
| 24h volume | $318.85 DEX | $27.48K DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.09K | $865.15K |
| FDV | $20.88K | $3.43M |
| Holders | 11,753 | 2,723 |
| Age (days) | 1,736 | 103 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- AURA measures ~122× the liquidity of SWASH
- AURA measures ~86× the 24h volume of SWASH
- SWASH measures ~4.3× the holder count of AURA
- over the shared window SWASH moved +8.30% while AURA moved −15.4%
What the data says
SWASH
The headline on SWASH is a permission the team still holds. Right now SWASH's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the trading data, SWASH shows thin liquidity of $7.09K, 11,753 holders and an established 1,736-day history as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $7.09K pool against a ~$746.52K cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so SWASH's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. A 11,753-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
AURA
AURA — Auralith — is an 88-day-old Polygon token at 0xd9d12f43918363cea1c0b62d16f1f81b8eae91e0, priced at a $3.4 million market cap on the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The venue side is the healthiest in this batch relative to size: $865 thousand of tracked pool liquidity is deep for a $4.5M cap — a quarter of the valuation sits in the exit book. What isn't measured matters as much: contract controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot and holder distribution wasn't resolved, so the structural questions stay open.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SWASH or AURA?
By tracked market cap: SWASH (Gnosis) measures $746.52K and AURA (Polygon) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SWASH or AURA?
On the contract checks we publish: SWASH (Gnosis) grades C and AURA (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SWASH and AURA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show SWASH at +8.30% and AURA at −15.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.