HostSWASH vs USDT — price, size and safety, side by side
SWASH (Gnosis) vs USDT (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
SWASH vs USDT — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| SWASH | USDT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0008136 | $0.9991 |
| Market cap | $746.52K | $9.19B |
| 24h volume | $318.85 DEX | $1.12B DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.09K | $548.60M |
| FDV | $20.88K | $9.19B |
| Holders | 11,753 | 80,624,971 |
| Age (days) | 1,736 | 311 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- USDT measures ~12,304× the market cap of SWASH
- USDT measures ~77,400× the liquidity of SWASH
- USDT measures ~3,505,475× the 24h volume of SWASH
- USDT measures ~6,860× the holder count of SWASH
- over the shared window SWASH moved +8.43% while USDT moved −0.09%
What the data says
SWASH
The headline on SWASH is a permission the team still holds. Right now SWASH's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. It's the main reason the read sits at 60/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On the trading data, SWASH shows thin liquidity of $7.09K, 11,753 holders and an established 1,736-day history as of 2026-10-09. Weigh the $7.09K pool against a ~$746.52K cap and one thing stands out — it's a slim pool for the size, so SWASH's price is easier to move than its market cap implies, and large size should scale in and out patiently. A 11,753-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
USDT
USDT on BSC is Tether's dollar on the chain that still clears a meaningful share of stablecoin volume — issued by Binance's peg mechanism under the BEP-20 standard at 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955, the canonical BSC mint. Our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $548.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest chain note: this is a pegged representation — the reserve sits with Tether, and the BSC contract is Binance's wrapped issuance of that claim, not a second Tether mint. That makes its risk profile two-layered: Tether's attestation cadence underneath, plus the bridge-custody layer Binance operates on top. For most users the distinction never matters; for anyone holding size it is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SWASH or USDT?
By tracked market cap: SWASH (Gnosis) measures $746.52K and USDT (BNB Chain) measures $9.19B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SWASH or USDT?
On the contract checks we publish: SWASH (Gnosis) grades C and USDT (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SWASH and USDT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show SWASH at +8.43% and USDT at −0.09%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.