HostTOKABU vs MON — price, size and safety, side by side
TOKABU (Solana) vs MON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
TOKABU vs MON — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| TOKABU | MON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001127 | $0.02334 |
| Market cap | $1.66M | $2.46B |
| 24h volume | $43.95K DEX | $3.74M DEX |
| Liquidity | $177.97K | $1.57M |
| FDV | $1.66M | $2.46B |
| Holders | 10,955 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 323 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- MON measures ~1,480× the market cap of TOKABU
- MON measures ~8.8× the liquidity of TOKABU
- MON measures ~85× the 24h volume of TOKABU
- over the shared window TOKABU moved −8.05% while MON moved +8.77%
What the data says
TOKABU
The Spirit of Gambling — TOKABU — a Solana meme personifying gambling spirit (a degen-culture mascot), at mint H8xQ6poBjB9DTPMDTKWzWPrnxu4bDEhybxiouF8Ppump. The October 6, 2026 snapshot shows about $178 thousand of liquidity and roughly 10,955 holders.
Degen-mascot memes are self-aware community tokens — the brand is the culture's own mythology — and the economics are what they are: no cash flows, value is the community (10,955 holders) plus the brand's continued salience.
MON
This row tracks MON — Monad's native token — under the all-zeroes placeholder 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 that DEX data uses for a chain's native asset. The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $1.6 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest definitional note is the same as on ethereum and arbitrum: MON is the chain's native asset, so there is no mint contract to audit — the checks on this page describe the pools it trades against, not the token. What MON is worth is a question about whether Monad's parallel-EVM thesis (Solana-class speed on EVM semantics) wins real orderflow — the row measures the pools, not the thesis.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TOKABU or MON?
By tracked market cap: TOKABU (Solana) measures $1.66M and MON (Monad) measures $2.46B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TOKABU or MON?
On the contract checks we publish: TOKABU (Solana) grades A and MON (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TOKABU and MON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show TOKABU at −8.05% and MON at +8.77%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.