HostTQQQX vs MANYU — price, size and safety, side by side
TQQQX (Solana) vs MANYU (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
TQQQX vs MANYU — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| TQQQX | MANYU | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $69.22 | $0.00008336 |
| Market cap | $45.65M | $103.62K |
| 24h volume | $5.99K DEX | $168.74 DEX |
| Liquidity | $51.67K | $51.23K |
| FDV | $45.65M | $103.62K |
| Holders | 725 | 12,673 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- TQQQX measures ~441× the market cap of MANYU
- TQQQX measures ~36× the 24h volume of MANYU
- MANYU measures ~17× the holder count of TQQQX
- over the shared window TQQQX moved −4.43% while MANYU moved −10.9%
What the data says
TQQQX
TQQQX is the xStock for TQQQ — a tokenized claim on a 3x daily-leveraged Nasdaq-100 ETF, which makes it the most aggressive instrument in the xStock family. The mint XsjQP3iMAaQ3kQScQKthQpx9ALRbjKAjQtHg6TFomoc is what our scan tracks: $45.6 million market cap, $52 thousand of liquidity and 725 holders as of October 6, 2026.
Two honest warnings stack here. The family one: issuer custody plus after-hours quoting. The product one is bigger: TQQQ resets its leverage daily, so the tokenized claim inherits volatility decay — over choppy multi-week stretches it can underperform naive 3x expectations even when the index ends flat. A tokenized leveraged ETF is a trading instrument, not a hold; the cap figures describe supply, not suitability.
MANYU
littlemanyu — MANYU — the Solana token of the Manyu shiba-inu (a real viral dog with its own social following), at mint CS7LmjtuugEUWtFgfyto79nrksKigv7Fdcp9qPuigdLs. The October 6, 2026 snapshot shows about $51 thousand of liquidity and roughly 12,673 holders.
Real-animal memes anchor the brand to a living mascot — the same genre as Hobbes — which gives the token a persistent narrative hook as long as the account stays active.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TQQQX or MANYU?
By tracked market cap: TQQQX (Solana) measures $45.65M and MANYU (Solana) measures $103.62K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TQQQX or MANYU?
On the contract checks we publish: TQQQX (Solana) grades C and MANYU (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TQQQX and MANYU performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show TQQQX at −4.43% and MANYU at −10.9%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.