HostUSD₮0 vs USDC.E — price, size and safety, side by side
USD₮0 (Berachain) vs USDC.E (Gnosis) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
USD₮0 vs USDC.E — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| USD₮0 | USDC.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9991 | $0.9979 |
| Market cap | $4.08B | $9.84M |
| 24h volume | $167.24K DEX | $154.06K DEX |
| Liquidity | $625.54K | $3.18M |
| FDV | $37.36M | $9.86M |
| Holders | 75,853 | 7,909 |
| Age (days) | 418 | 521 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- USD₮0 measures ~415× the market cap of USDC.E
- USDC.E measures ~5.1× the liquidity of USD₮0
- USD₮0 measures ~9.6× the holder count of USDC.E
What the data says
USD₮0
There's a small gap on this page — USD₮0's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
By the numbers, USD₮0 is showing thin liquidity of $625.54K, 75,853 holders and an established record at 418 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $625.54K of depth against a market cap of about $4.08B — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: USD₮0 reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. A 75,853-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
USDC.E
One detail on USDC.E didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, USDC.E carries $3.18M of on-chain liquidity, 7,909 wallets holding and an established record at 521 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $9.84M in market cap, the $3.18M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 7,909-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of USDC.E as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USD₮0 or USDC.E?
By tracked market cap: USD₮0 (Berachain) measures $4.08B and USDC.E (Gnosis) measures $9.84M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USD₮0 or USDC.E?
On the contract checks we publish: USD₮0 (Berachain) grades B and USDC.E (Gnosis) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USD₮0 and USDC.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show USD₮0 at −0.55% and USDC.E at −0.22%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.