HostUSDC.E vs AUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
USDC.E (Gnosis) vs AUSD (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
USDC.E vs AUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| USDC.E | AUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9979 | $0.9991 |
| Market cap | $9.84M | $176.59M |
| 24h volume | $154.06K DEX | $721.99K DEX |
| Liquidity | $3.18M | $2.45M |
| FDV | $9.86M | $108.19M |
| Holders | 7,909 | 10,392 |
| Age (days) | 521 | 324 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- AUSD measures ~18× the market cap of USDC.E
- AUSD measures ~4.7× the 24h volume of USDC.E
What the data says
USDC.E
One detail on USDC.E didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, USDC.E carries $3.18M of on-chain liquidity, 7,909 wallets holding and an established record at 521 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $9.84M in market cap, the $3.18M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 7,909-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of USDC.E as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
AUSD
AUSD is Agora's institutional dollar — a stablecoin built for treasury-grade backing (State Street custodian, VanEck management) that targets the same regulated-treasury ground as USDC and PYUSD. The deployment 0x00000000efe302beaa2b3e6e1b18d08d69a9012a is the Monad deployment — the same multichain address AUSD uses on every chain it lands on; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $2 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: AUSD competes on custody pedigree rather than yield gimmicks — which means its risk profile is the boring kind (issuer solvency, attestation cadence, redemption terms) that is easier to verify but no smaller for being verifiable. AUSD also exists on Solana under a different mint; this Monad deployment carries the same canonical multichain address as its siblings.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDC.E or AUSD?
By tracked market cap: USDC.E (Gnosis) measures $9.84M and AUSD (Monad) measures $176.59M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDC.E or AUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: USDC.E (Gnosis) grades B and AUSD (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDC.E and AUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show USDC.E at −0.03% and AUSD at −0.06%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.