HostUSDC.E vs KDK — price, size and safety, side by side
USDC.E (Gnosis) vs KDK (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
USDC.E vs KDK — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| USDC.E | KDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9979 | $0.08992 |
| Market cap | $9.84M | $1.38M |
| 24h volume | $154.06K DEX | $4.95K DEX |
| Liquidity | $3.18M | $232.65K |
| FDV | $9.86M | $9.35M |
| Holders | 7,909 | 5,631 |
| Age (days) | 521 | 296 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- USDC.E measures ~7.1× the market cap of KDK
- USDC.E measures ~14× the liquidity of KDK
- USDC.E measures ~31× the 24h volume of KDK
What the data says
USDC.E
One detail on USDC.E didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, USDC.E carries $3.18M of on-chain liquidity, 7,909 wallets holding and an established record at 521 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $9.84M in market cap, the $3.18M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 7,909-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of USDC.E as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
KDK
The best news on KDK is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Neither lever existing is the main reason KDK's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Market-wise, KDK carries $232.65K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 5,631 and a maturing record at 296 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $1.38M in market cap, the $232.65K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 5,631-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created KDK holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDC.E or KDK?
By tracked market cap: USDC.E (Gnosis) measures $9.84M and KDK (Berachain) measures $1.38M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDC.E or KDK?
On the contract checks we publish: USDC.E (Gnosis) grades B and KDK (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDC.E and KDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show USDC.E at −0.22% and KDK at −3.84%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.