HostVCNT vs GNS — price, size and safety, side by side
VCNT (Polygon) vs GNS (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-17.
VCNT vs GNS — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| VCNT | GNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $18.88 | $0.4578 |
| Market cap | — | $11.60M |
| 24h volume | $24.21K DEX | $21.37K DEX |
| Liquidity | $56.01K | $213.78K |
| FDV | $186.54M | $8.18M |
| Holders | 6,275 | 14,134 |
| Age (days) | 1,215 | 832 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- GNS measures ~3.8× the liquidity of VCNT
- GNS measures ~2.3× the holder count of VCNT
- over the shared window VCNT moved +0.90% while GNS moved +27.0%
What the data says
VCNT
There's a small gap on this page — VCNT's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, VCNT shows a $56.01K pool, 6,275 holders and an established 1,215-day history as of 2026-10-09. Read $56.01K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. The 6,275-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of VCNT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
GNS
GNS at 0x18c11fd286c5ec11c3b683caa813b77f5163a122 is the Gains Network token on Arbitrum — the asset of a decentralized leverage-trading platform, 832 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. 14,134 holders share the book around a $11.6 million market cap, against a $8.2 million fully-diluted figure that sits below the cap — an unusual inversion reflecting a circulating float larger than the measured local supply basis of 16.7 million units.
The D grade is earned on the contract side: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted. Freeze authority is revoked, and it is not a proxy. The ten largest wallets hold 56.7% of supply. $213.8 thousand of workable tracked depth sees $22.6 thousand of daily volume.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VCNT or GNS?
By tracked market cap: VCNT (Polygon) measures — and GNS (Arbitrum) measures $11.60M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VCNT or GNS?
On the contract checks we publish: VCNT (Polygon) grades B and GNS (Arbitrum) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VCNT and GNS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show VCNT at +0.90% and GNS at +27.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.