HostVSN vs UNI — price, size and safety, side by side
VSN (Arbitrum) vs UNI (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
VSN vs UNI — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| VSN | UNI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.04274 | $7.46 |
| Market cap | $165.24M | $4.61B |
| 24h volume | $101.44K DEX | $2.16M DEX |
| Liquidity | $894.67K | $26.90M |
| FDV | $4.47M | $6.54B |
| Holders | 43,129 | 383,059 |
| Age (days) | 329 | 1,745 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- UNI measures ~28× the market cap of VSN
- UNI measures ~30× the liquidity of VSN
- UNI measures ~21× the 24h volume of VSN
- UNI measures ~8.9× the holder count of VSN
- over the shared window VSN moved −2.91% while UNI moved −17.3%
What the data says
VSN
VSN at 0x6fbbbd8bfb1cd3986b1d05e7861a0f62f87db74b — Vision — is an Arbitrum asset 314 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $165.2 million market cap dwarfs the $4.5 million fully-diluted figure priced on the 101.2 million local units — the familiar shape where the headline valuation lives on another venue while this chain carries a slice.
The local book is thin against that headline: $894.7 thousand of tracked depth on $38.5 thousand of daily volume — a quiet book that does its real clearing elsewhere. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority posture is a live-scan question.
UNI
UNI is Uniswap's governance token — the asset of the protocol that invented the automated market maker and still clears more DEX volume than the rest of the field combined. The deployment 0x1f9840a85d5af5bf1d1762f925bdaddc4201f984 is the canonical mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $26.9 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set.
The honest asymmetry is the governance-token shape: UNI's thesis is control over a fee-generating machine, but the "fee switch" — the mechanism that would route protocol revenue to holders — has been proposed and deferred for years, so the token trades on governance value and the perennial expectation rather than cashflow it actually pays. That makes its valuation more reflexive than a productive asset's.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VSN or UNI?
By tracked market cap: VSN (Arbitrum) measures $165.24M and UNI (Ethereum) measures $4.61B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VSN or UNI?
On the contract checks we publish: VSN (Arbitrum) grades B and UNI (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VSN and UNI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show VSN at −2.91% and UNI at −17.3%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.