HostVVS vs LION — price, size and safety, side by side
VVS (Cronos) vs LION (Cronos) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
VVS vs LION — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| VVS | LION | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0000009394 | $0.001255 |
| Market cap | $43.09M | $42.48M |
| 24h volume | $29.65K DEX | $5.52K DEX |
| Liquidity | $17.11M | $1.07M |
| FDV | $94.10M | $138.47M |
| Holders | 126,843 | 10,332 |
| Age (days) | 1,792 | 585 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- VVS measures ~16× the liquidity of LION
- VVS measures ~5.4× the 24h volume of LION
- VVS measures ~12× the holder count of LION
What the data says
VVS
The headline on VVS is a permission the team still holds. The mint function on VVS's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. That's what's holding the score at 75/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Market-wise, VVS carries deep liquidity of $17.11M, 126,843 wallets holding and 1,792 days old as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $17.11M pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $43.09M — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A holder base of 126,843 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of VVS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
LION
LION gets the fundamentals right where it counts most: the contract itself. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Neither lever existing is the main reason LION's 100/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Looking at the market data, LION shows $1.07M of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 10,332 and an established 585-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $42.48M, the $1.07M pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 10,332-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created LION holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VVS or LION?
By tracked market cap: VVS (Cronos) measures $43.09M and LION (Cronos) measures $42.48M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VVS or LION?
On the contract checks we publish: VVS (Cronos) grades B and LION (Cronos) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VVS and LION performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show VVS at −5.05% and LION at −9.33%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.