HostWBERA vs KDK — price, size and safety, side by side
WBERA (Berachain) vs KDK (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WBERA vs KDK — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WBERA | KDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1884 | $0.09009 |
| Market cap | $5.82K | $1.38M |
| 24h volume | $376.44K DEX | $4.95K DEX |
| Liquidity | $938.16K | $232.65K |
| FDV | $18.33M | $9.35M |
| Holders | 55,567 | 5,631 |
| Age (days) | 610 | 296 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- KDK measures ~237× the market cap of WBERA
- WBERA measures ~4.0× the liquidity of KDK
- WBERA measures ~76× the 24h volume of KDK
- WBERA measures ~9.9× the holder count of KDK
- over the shared window WBERA moved −10.7% while KDK moved −3.65%
What the data says
WBERA
Right at the foundation, WBERA does both of the things you'd hope to see. No new tokens can be created by the contract, so the supply you see is the supply there is, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. So the A here (100/100, 2026-10-09) rests on a clean foundation — the rest is just reading the numbers.
Here's where WBERA stands today: $938.16K of on-chain liquidity, 55,567 wallets holding and an established 610-day history as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $938.16K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $5.82K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A 55,567-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it.
KDK
The best news on KDK is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Neither lever existing is the main reason KDK's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Market-wise, KDK carries $232.65K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 5,631 and a maturing record at 296 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $1.38M in market cap, the $232.65K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 5,631-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created KDK holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBERA or KDK?
By tracked market cap: WBERA (Berachain) measures $5.82K and KDK (Berachain) measures $1.38M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBERA or KDK?
On the contract checks we publish: WBERA (Berachain) grades A and KDK (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBERA and KDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WBERA at −10.7% and KDK at −3.65%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.