HostWBTC vs EVA — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs EVA (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WBTC vs EVA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WBTC | EVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $44.32 |
| Market cap | $9.63B | — |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $44.55K DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $5.47M |
| FDV | $9.63B | $818.08M |
| Holders | 197,266 | 8,567 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 802 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~40× the liquidity of EVA
- WBTC measures ~4,174× the 24h volume of EVA
- WBTC measures ~23× the holder count of EVA
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
EVA
EVA — EverValueCoin at 0x45d9831d8751b2325f3dbf48db748723726e1c8c — is 802 days into an Arbitrum record with a contract that has stayed clean the whole way: it cannot mint new supply, cannot pause or blacklist transfers, source is verified, and the creator wallet holds under 0.01% of supply.
The market structure splits two ways at the October 9, 2026 snapshot. $5.5 million of liquidity is a serious pool in absolute terms but thin against a $818.1 million fully diluted valuation — size an exit against the pool, not the valuation — while the holder side is healthy: 8,567 wallets, with the top ten at about 29.5% — one of the broadest distributions among established tokens this batch.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or EVA?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and EVA (Arbitrum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or EVA?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and EVA (Arbitrum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and EVA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WBTC at −3.36% and EVA at −2.62%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.