HostWBTC vs GMON — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs GMON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WBTC vs GMON — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WBTC | GMON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $0.0251 |
| Market cap | $9.63B | $2.26M |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $279.61 DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $322.90K |
| FDV | $9.63B | $980.28K |
| Holders | 197,266 | 5,755 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 308 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~4,264× the market cap of GMON
- WBTC measures ~683× the liquidity of GMON
- WBTC measures ~665,178× the 24h volume of GMON
- WBTC measures ~34× the holder count of GMON
- over the shared window WBTC moved −3.36% while GMON moved −11.8%
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
GMON
gMON at 0x8498312a6b3cbd158bf0c93abdcf29e6e4f55081 is a Monad liquid-staking receipt — the yield-bearing claim on staked MON — 293 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $2.3 million market cap sits above a $980.3 thousand fully-diluted figure on 38.3 million units.
The book is deep for the slice: $322.9 thousand of tracked depth against a $196 daily volume — receipts like this do their real mint-and-redeem through the staking contract, leaving the pool for marginal flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or GMON?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and GMON (Monad) measures $2.26M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or GMON?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and GMON (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and GMON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WBTC at −3.36% and GMON at −11.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.