HostWBTC vs KDK — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs KDK (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WBTC vs KDK — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WBTC | KDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $0.09009 |
| Market cap | $9.63B | $1.38M |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $4.95K DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $232.65K |
| FDV | $9.63B | $9.35M |
| Holders | 197,266 | 5,631 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 296 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~6,978× the market cap of KDK
- WBTC measures ~949× the liquidity of KDK
- WBTC measures ~37,544× the 24h volume of KDK
- WBTC measures ~35× the holder count of KDK
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
KDK
The best news on KDK is the part risky tokens usually get wrong — its contract. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Neither lever existing is the main reason KDK's 92/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
Market-wise, KDK carries $232.65K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 5,631 and a maturing record at 296 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $1.38M in market cap, the $232.65K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 5,631-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created KDK holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or KDK?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and KDK (Berachain) measures $1.38M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or KDK?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and KDK (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and KDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WBTC at −2.13% and KDK at −3.65%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.