HostWBTC vs LV — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs LV (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WBTC vs LV — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WBTC | LV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $0.05674 |
| Market cap | $9.63B | $5.73M |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $894.12 DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $202.45K |
| FDV | $9.63B | $5.71M |
| Holders | 197,266 | 3,863 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 275 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~1,681× the market cap of LV
- WBTC measures ~1,090× the liquidity of LV
- WBTC measures ~208,014× the 24h volume of LV
- WBTC measures ~51× the holder count of LV
- over the shared window WBTC moved −3.36% while LV moved −10.8%
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
LV
LV at 0x1001ff13bf368aa4fa85f21043648079f00e1001 is a Monad asset 275 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $5.7 million market cap across a 90.0 million supply.
The book is workable and the tape thin: $202.5 thousand of tracked depth on $894 of 24-hour volume — a pool that holds while almost nothing trades through it. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or LV?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and LV (Monad) measures $5.73M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or LV?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and LV (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and LV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WBTC at −3.36% and LV at −10.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.