HostWBTC vs SCUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs SCUSD (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
WBTC vs SCUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| WBTC | SCUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $0.9943 |
| Market cap | $9.63B | $1.92M |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $5.35K DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $93.38K |
| FDV | $9.63B | $643.69K |
| Holders | 197,266 | 9,491 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 626 |
| Safety grade | C | E |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~5,020× the market cap of SCUSD
- WBTC measures ~2,363× the liquidity of SCUSD
- WBTC measures ~34,747× the 24h volume of SCUSD
- WBTC measures ~21× the holder count of SCUSD
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
SCUSD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on SCUSD to flag. Right now SCUSD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. That's what's holding the score at 39/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Here's where SCUSD stands today: a $93.38K pool, 9,491 wallets holding and 626 days old as of 2026-10-09. The $93.38K pool against a ~$1.92M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 9,491 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SCUSD as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or SCUSD?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and SCUSD (Sonic) measures $1.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or SCUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and SCUSD (Sonic) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and SCUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show WBTC at −1.40% and SCUSD at −0.64%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.