HostWBTC vs SHMON — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs SHMON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
WBTC vs SHMON — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| WBTC | SHMON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $0.0368 |
| Market cap | $9.63B | $7.63M |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $36.14K DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $251.03K |
| FDV | $9.63B | $7.63M |
| Holders | 197,266 | 11,375 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 299 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~1,262× the market cap of SHMON
- WBTC measures ~879× the liquidity of SHMON
- WBTC measures ~5,146× the 24h volume of SHMON
- WBTC measures ~17× the holder count of SHMON
- over the shared window WBTC moved −2.86% while SHMON moved −9.68%
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
SHMON
shMON at 0x1b68626dca36c7fe922fd2d55e4f631d962de19c — ShMonad — is Monad's liquid-staking receipt: the token that represents staked MON and accrues the staking yield in its exchange rate rather than in rebased balances. The October 9, 2026 snapshot prices a $7.6 million market cap across 206.8 million units, 299 days into the record.
The book is workable for the chain's scale: $251.0 thousand of tracked depth on $15.6 thousand of daily volume — a quiet book typical of a staking receipt, whose holders mostly mint and redeem through the staking contract rather than trading the pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or SHMON?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and SHMON (Monad) measures $7.63M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or SHMON?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and SHMON (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and SHMON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show WBTC at −2.86% and SHMON at −9.68%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.