HostWBTC vs SUSDAI — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs SUSDAI (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
WBTC vs SUSDAI — normalized performance, 2026-09-16 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| WBTC | SUSDAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $1.12 |
| Market cap | $9.63B | $479.95M |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $1.70M DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $7.60M |
| FDV | $9.63B | $338.88M |
| Holders | 197,266 | 3,702 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 448 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~20× the market cap of SUSDAI
- WBTC measures ~29× the liquidity of SUSDAI
- WBTC measures ~109× the 24h volume of SUSDAI
- WBTC measures ~53× the holder count of SUSDAI
- over the shared window WBTC moved +7.90% while SUSDAI moved +0.35%
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
SUSDAI
SUSDAI is the staked wrapper of USDai — the yield-bearing form of a dollar token issued against AI-infrastructure financing — trading on Arbitrum at 0x0b2b2b2076d95dda7817e785989fe353fe955ef9. The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $7.6 million of tracked pool liquidity, the deepest single line item in this slice of the index.
What the numbers say: roughly seven months of trading history behind it, about $2.2 million of 24-hour volume against that liquidity base — a turnover ratio near 12%, the shape of a yield instrument held rather than churned. The ~$1.11 print against a $1-asset wrapper is consistent with accrued staking yield rather than a broken peg, though the snapshot alone cannot separate the two.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or SUSDAI?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and SUSDAI (Arbitrum) measures $479.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or SUSDAI?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and SUSDAI (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and SUSDAI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-16 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show WBTC at +7.90% and SUSDAI at +0.35%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-16→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.