HostWBTC vs USD0++ — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs USD0++ (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WBTC vs USD0++ — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WBTC | USD0++ | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $0.9747 |
| Market cap | $9.63B | — |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $4.15 DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $5.33M |
| FDV | $9.63B | $504.34M |
| Holders | 197,266 | 2,713 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 528 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~41× the liquidity of USD0++
- WBTC measures ~44,813,974× the 24h volume of USD0++
- WBTC measures ~73× the holder count of USD0++
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
USD0++
USD0++ is Usual Protocol's bonded T-bill — the yield-bearing form of its USD0 stablecoin, structured as a liquid bond that locks the underlying for a term and pays boosted yield for the commitment. The deployment 0x35d8949372d46b7a3d5a56006ae77b215fc69bc0 is the mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $5.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: the "++" is duration — USD0++ trades instant redeemability for a locked term in exchange for protocol yield, which means it can and does trade below the dollar value of the USD0 inside it when the market marks that lock-up at a discount. A holder isn't buying a stablecoin; they're buying a bond with a market price.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or USD0++?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and USD0++ (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or USD0++?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and USD0++ (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and USD0++ performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WBTC at +4.24% and USD0++ at +0.32%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.