HostWCRO vs WETH — price, size and safety, side by side
WCRO (Cronos) vs WETH (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WCRO vs WETH — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WCRO | WETH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05806 | $2.42K |
| Market cap | $34.77M | $5.41B |
| 24h volume | $557.59K DEX | $462.86M DEX |
| Liquidity | $38.17M | $902.53M |
| FDV | $43.46M | $5.39B |
| Holders | 89,649 | 3,680,746 |
| Age (days) | 1,792 | 1,727 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- WETH measures ~155× the market cap of WCRO
- WETH measures ~24× the liquidity of WCRO
- WETH measures ~830× the 24h volume of WCRO
- WETH measures ~41× the holder count of WCRO
What the data says
WCRO
WCRO starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. The contract can't create new tokens — the supply is capped for good, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts WCRO at 100/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
On liquidity and holders, WCRO shows a $38.17M pool, 89,649 holders and an established 1,792-day history as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $38.17M pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $34.77M — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 89,649 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
WETH
WETH is the oldest load-bearing contract in DeFi. Deployed in December 2017 as WETH9, the contract at 0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2 does exactly one thing: wrap ETH — which predates the ERC-20 standard and doesn't conform to it — into a token that does, redeemable one-for-one, instantly, by anyone, forever. It has no owner, no admin functions, no upgrade path, and no pause switch. Nearly every DEX trade, lending market, and NFT sale on Ethereum has settled through it at some point; it is less a token than a piece of the chain's plumbing.
That architecture is why the usual checklist comes back almost empty. There is no team to rug, no supply policy to abuse — WETH supply is simply however much ETH is currently deposited in the contract, minted on wrap and burned on unwrap. The failure mode people theorize about (the contract holding less ETH than WETH outstanding) would require a bug that eight-plus years of the highest-value adversarial testing in crypto has not found. HostDeFi's October 9, 2026 snapshot shows roughly $903 million of tracked pool liquidity and $73 million of daily volume on this deployment, and both understate reality — WETH is one side of thousands of pools our sample doesn't enumerate.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WCRO or WETH?
By tracked market cap: WCRO (Cronos) measures $34.77M and WETH (Ethereum) measures $5.41B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WCRO or WETH?
On the contract checks we publish: WCRO (Cronos) grades A and WETH (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WCRO and WETH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WCRO at −4.81% and WETH at −2.77%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.