Open app

WETH vs IBERA — price, size and safety, side by side

WETH (Ethereum) vs IBERA (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.

WETHA

$2.42K
Wrapped Ether on Ethereum
Trade WETH
vs

IBERAB

$0.1959
Infrared BERA on Berachain
Trade IBERA

WETH vs IBERA — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24

100 — shared start
WETH −2.77%  ·  IBERA −11.4% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
WETHIBERA
Price$2.42K$0.1959
Market cap$5.41B$17.52M
24h volume$462.86M DEX$3.02K DEX
Liquidity$902.53M$42.63K
FDV$5.39B$17.52M
Holders3,680,74635,930
Age (days)1,727607
Safety gradeAB

Where they differ

What the data says

WETH

WETH is the oldest load-bearing contract in DeFi. Deployed in December 2017 as WETH9, the contract at 0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2 does exactly one thing: wrap ETH — which predates the ERC-20 standard and doesn't conform to it — into a token that does, redeemable one-for-one, instantly, by anyone, forever. It has no owner, no admin functions, no upgrade path, and no pause switch. Nearly every DEX trade, lending market, and NFT sale on Ethereum has settled through it at some point; it is less a token than a piece of the chain's plumbing.

That architecture is why the usual checklist comes back almost empty. There is no team to rug, no supply policy to abuse — WETH supply is simply however much ETH is currently deposited in the contract, minted on wrap and burned on unwrap. The failure mode people theorize about (the contract holding less ETH than WETH outstanding) would require a bug that eight-plus years of the highest-value adversarial testing in crypto has not found. HostDeFi's October 9, 2026 snapshot shows roughly $903 million of tracked pool liquidity and $73 million of daily volume on this deployment, and both understate reality — WETH is one side of thousands of pools our sample doesn't enumerate.

IBERA

There's a small gap on this page — IBERA's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.

Looking at the market data, IBERA shows a $42.63K pool, a holder base of 35,930 and an established record at 607 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $42.63K of depth against a market cap of about $17.52M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: IBERA reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. 35,930 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of IBERA as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.

FAQ

Which is bigger, WETH or IBERA?

By tracked market cap: WETH (Ethereum) measures $5.41B and IBERA (Berachain) measures $17.52M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, WETH or IBERA?

On the contract checks we publish: WETH (Ethereum) grades A and IBERA (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have WETH and IBERA performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WETH at −2.77% and IBERA at −11.4%.

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.