HostWM vs CDXR — price, size and safety, side by side
WM (Ethereum) vs CDXR (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WM vs CDXR — normalized performance, 2026-08-19 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WM | CDXR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.0000 | $0.02035 |
| Market cap | $82.04M | $286.29M |
| 24h volume | $26.37K DEX | $587.74K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.01M | $980.95K |
| FDV | $76.48M | $33.66M |
| Holders | 322 | 1,839 |
| Age (days) | 744 | 68 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CDXR measures ~3.5× the market cap of WM
- CDXR measures ~22× the 24h volume of WM
- CDXR measures ~5.7× the holder count of WM
What the data says
WM
Wrapped M is M^0's portable institutional dollar — the bridged representation of the M stablecoin, which is itself issued against T-bill collateral under a framework designed for institutional minters. The deployment 0x437cc33344a0b27a429f795ff6b469c72698b291 is the wrapped mint on Ethereum; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $1.0 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing: wM is a claim on M, and M is a claim on a collateral book operated under M^0's rules — so the holder sits two layers from the T-bills, one more than a USDC holder does. The design's pitch is interoperability (M is meant to power bespoke stablecoins); the cost is that the custody chain is longer than the marketing implies.
CDXR
Codex (CDXR) is a small-cap token on the Ethereum mainnet — contract 0x40aaf75454036bed56f3266ccf18f6b7befd6aca — carrying $981 thousand of tracked pool liquidity as of October 6, 2026.
The honest framing: "Codex" is a name several projects have used, and at this scale the distinguishing fact is the contract, not the brand. Treat issuer verification as the whole due-diligence question — if the team's official channels don't point at this address, the page you wanted belongs to a different token.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WM or CDXR?
By tracked market cap: WM (Ethereum) measures $82.04M and CDXR (Ethereum) measures $286.29M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WM or CDXR?
On the contract checks we publish: WM (Ethereum) grades B and CDXR (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WM and CDXR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-19 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WM at +0.01% and CDXR at +2.15%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-19→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.