HostWS vs FT — price, size and safety, side by side
WS (Sonic) vs FT (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
WS vs FT — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| WS | FT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05648 | $0.1436 |
| Market cap | $38.09K | $72.17M |
| 24h volume | $1.29M DEX | $25.89K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.49M | $189.39K |
| FDV | $6.78M | $394.06K |
| Holders | 62,154 | — |
| Age (days) | 644 | 69 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- FT measures ~1,895× the market cap of WS
- WS measures ~7.9× the liquidity of FT
- WS measures ~50× the 24h volume of FT
- over the shared window WS moved +24.9% while FT moved −3.24%
What the data says
WS
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on WS. Right now WS's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Until that changes, WS stays around 75/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
Here's where WS stands today: deep liquidity of $1.49M, 62,154 holders and an established 644-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $38.09K in market cap, the $1.49M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 62,154-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FT
The most important thing to know about FT is its authority setup. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint and freeze levers hasn't been removed, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply or freeze transfers. It's the main reason the read sits at 41/100 (grade D) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
On liquidity and holders, FT shows a $189.39K pool and a young record at 69 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $189.39K pool against roughly $72.17M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of FT as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WS or FT?
By tracked market cap: WS (Sonic) measures $38.09K and FT (Sonic) measures $72.17M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WS or FT?
On the contract checks we publish: WS (Sonic) grades B and FT (Sonic) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WS and FT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show WS at +24.9% and FT at −3.24%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.