HostWS vs STS — price, size and safety, side by side
WS (Sonic) vs STS (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-15.
WS vs STS — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| WS | STS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05648 | $0.06148 |
| Market cap | $38.09K | $4.64M |
| 24h volume | $1.29M DEX | $25.74K DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.49M | $479.59K |
| FDV | $6.78M | $4.64M |
| Holders | 62,154 | 20,463 |
| Age (days) | 644 | 641 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- STS measures ~122× the market cap of WS
- WS measures ~3.1× the liquidity of STS
- WS measures ~50× the 24h volume of STS
- WS measures ~3.0× the holder count of STS
What the data says
WS
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on WS. Right now WS's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Until that changes, WS stays around 75/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
Here's where WS stands today: deep liquidity of $1.49M, 62,154 holders and an established 644-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $38.09K in market cap, the $1.49M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 62,154-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
STS
There's a small gap on this page — STS's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On the market side, STS brings a $479.59K pool, a holder base of 20,463 and 641 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $4.64M in market cap, the $479.59K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 20,463-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of STS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WS or STS?
By tracked market cap: WS (Sonic) measures $38.09K and STS (Sonic) measures $4.64M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WS or STS?
On the contract checks we publish: WS (Sonic) grades B and STS (Sonic) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WS and STS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show WS at +24.9% and STS at +26.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.