HostWS vs USDT — price, size and safety, side by side
WS (Sonic) vs USDT (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-15 / 2026-10-17.
WS vs USDT — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| WS | USDT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05648 | $0.9991 |
| Market cap | $38.09K | $9.19B |
| 24h volume | $1.29M DEX | $1.12B DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.49M | $548.60M |
| FDV | $6.78M | $9.19B |
| Holders | 62,154 | 80,624,971 |
| Age (days) | 644 | 311 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- USDT measures ~241,144× the market cap of WS
- USDT measures ~369× the liquidity of WS
- USDT measures ~866× the 24h volume of WS
- USDT measures ~1,297× the holder count of WS
- over the shared window WS moved +24.9% while USDT moved −0.11%
What the data says
WS
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on WS. Right now WS's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. Until that changes, WS stays around 75/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
Here's where WS stands today: deep liquidity of $1.49M, 62,154 holders and an established 644-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $38.09K in market cap, the $1.49M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 62,154-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
USDT
USDT on BSC is Tether's dollar on the chain that still clears a meaningful share of stablecoin volume — issued by Binance's peg mechanism under the BEP-20 standard at 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955, the canonical BSC mint. Our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $548.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest chain note: this is a pegged representation — the reserve sits with Tether, and the BSC contract is Binance's wrapped issuance of that claim, not a second Tether mint. That makes its risk profile two-layered: Tether's attestation cadence underneath, plus the bridge-custody layer Binance operates on top. For most users the distinction never matters; for anyone holding size it is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WS or USDT?
By tracked market cap: WS (Sonic) measures $38.09K and USDT (BNB Chain) measures $9.19B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WS or USDT?
On the contract checks we publish: WS (Sonic) grades B and USDT (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WS and USDT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show WS at +24.9% and USDT at −0.11%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.