HostWSTETH vs SCR — price, size and safety, side by side
WSTETH (Ethereum) vs SCR (Scroll) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
WSTETH vs SCR — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| WSTETH | SCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.02K | $0.02162 |
| Market cap | $11.49B | $4.95M |
| 24h volume | $11.82M DEX | $2.62K DEX |
| Liquidity | $48.32M | $11.39K |
| FDV | $11.44B | $26.03M |
| Holders | 39,244 | 132,947 |
| Age (days) | 386 | 717 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WSTETH measures ~2,323× the market cap of SCR
- WSTETH measures ~4,241× the liquidity of SCR
- WSTETH measures ~4,517× the 24h volume of SCR
- SCR measures ~3.4× the holder count of WSTETH
- over the shared window WSTETH moved −2.11% while SCR moved −17.0%
What the data says
WSTETH
wstETH is stETH made legible to DeFi — the same claim on Lido-staked Ether, wrapped so the balance stops moving: where stETH re-bases your token count upward each day, wstETH holds a fixed count and lets the exchange rate against stETH do the appreciating. That is the shape lending markets, bridges and LPs need, which is why the contract at 0x7f39c581f595b53c5cb19bd0b3f8da6c935e2ca0 became the canonical collateral form — our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $48.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on it.
The verdict therefore inherits stETH's, plus one wrapper-layer note. You hold a claim on staked ETH via Lido — subject to its validator set, Ethereum's exit queue, and stETH's own depeg memory (June 2022, when it traded visibly under par) — and the price shown for wstETH is stETH's price times a steadily growing conversion rate, so it will always quote above ETH while tracking correctly. Nothing about that is a defect; it is the mechanic to understand before reading the quote as a premium.
SCR
One detail on SCR didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On the market side, SCR brings $11.39K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 132,947 and an established 717-day history as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $11.39K of depth against a market cap of about $4.95M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: SCR reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. With 132,947 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SCR holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WSTETH or SCR?
By tracked market cap: WSTETH (Ethereum) measures $11.49B and SCR (Scroll) measures $4.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WSTETH or SCR?
On the contract checks we publish: WSTETH (Ethereum) grades B and SCR (Scroll) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WSTETH and SCR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show WSTETH at −2.11% and SCR at −17.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.