HostWSTETH vs SIS — price, size and safety, side by side
WSTETH (Ethereum) vs SIS (Scroll) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WSTETH vs SIS — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T06:15:22
| WSTETH | SIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.02K | $0.01738 |
| Market cap | $11.49B | $1.58M |
| 24h volume | $11.82M DEX | $40.37 DEX |
| Liquidity | $48.32M | $5.75K |
| FDV | $11.44B | $7.86K |
| Holders | 39,244 | 9,881 |
| Age (days) | 386 | 1,054 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- WSTETH measures ~7,292× the market cap of SIS
- WSTETH measures ~8,404× the liquidity of SIS
- WSTETH measures ~292,863× the 24h volume of SIS
- WSTETH measures ~4.0× the holder count of SIS
- over the shared window WSTETH moved −2.93% while SIS moved +7.03%
What the data says
WSTETH
wstETH is stETH made legible to DeFi — the same claim on Lido-staked Ether, wrapped so the balance stops moving: where stETH re-bases your token count upward each day, wstETH holds a fixed count and lets the exchange rate against stETH do the appreciating. That is the shape lending markets, bridges and LPs need, which is why the contract at 0x7f39c581f595b53c5cb19bd0b3f8da6c935e2ca0 became the canonical collateral form — our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $48.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on it.
The verdict therefore inherits stETH's, plus one wrapper-layer note. You hold a claim on staked ETH via Lido — subject to its validator set, Ethereum's exit queue, and stETH's own depeg memory (June 2022, when it traded visibly under par) — and the price shown for wstETH is stETH's price times a steadily growing conversion rate, so it will always quote above ETH while tracking correctly. Nothing about that is a defect; it is the mechanic to understand before reading the quote as a premium.
SIS
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on SIS to flag. Right now SIS's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. Until that changes, SIS stays around 40/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
On the market side, SIS brings $5.75K of on-chain liquidity, 9,881 wallets holding and 1,054 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $5.75K pool against roughly $1.58M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 9,881-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SIS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WSTETH or SIS?
By tracked market cap: WSTETH (Ethereum) measures $11.49B and SIS (Scroll) measures $1.58M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WSTETH or SIS?
On the contract checks we publish: WSTETH (Ethereum) grades B and SIS (Scroll) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WSTETH and SIS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T06:15:22, the measured snapshots show WSTETH at −2.93% and SIS at +7.03%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T06:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.