HostWXDAI vs OLAS — price, size and safety, side by side
WXDAI (Gnosis) vs OLAS (Gnosis) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WXDAI vs OLAS — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WXDAI | OLAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.998 | $0.0518 |
| Market cap | $44.66M | $13.31M |
| 24h volume | $403.87K DEX | $1.40K DEX |
| Liquidity | $852.73K | $181.84K |
| FDV | $44.58M | $600.37K |
| Holders | 46,329 | 2,373 |
| Age (days) | 564 | 1,094 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- WXDAI measures ~3.4× the market cap of OLAS
- WXDAI measures ~4.7× the liquidity of OLAS
- WXDAI measures ~287× the 24h volume of OLAS
- WXDAI measures ~20× the holder count of OLAS
- over the shared window WXDAI moved +0.05% while OLAS moved +16.6%
What the data says
WXDAI
WXDAI starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why WXDAI earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
On liquidity and holders, WXDAI shows workable liquidity of $852.73K, a holder base of 46,329 and 564 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $44.66M, the $852.73K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 46,329-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created WXDAI holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
OLAS
There's a small gap on this page — OLAS's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On liquidity and holders, OLAS shows a $181.84K pool, 2,373 holders and an established 1,094-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $13.31M, the $181.84K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 2,373-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created OLAS holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WXDAI or OLAS?
By tracked market cap: WXDAI (Gnosis) measures $44.66M and OLAS (Gnosis) measures $13.31M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WXDAI or OLAS?
On the contract checks we publish: WXDAI (Gnosis) grades A and OLAS (Gnosis) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WXDAI and OLAS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WXDAI at +0.05% and OLAS at +16.6%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.