HostXAUG vs PROS — price, size and safety, side by side
XAUG (Base) vs PROS (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
XAUG vs PROS — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| XAUG | PROS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.96K | $0.5889 |
| Market cap | — | $2.69M |
| 24h volume | $5.58M DEX | $2.59M DEX |
| Liquidity | $586.85K | $570.37K |
| FDV | $12.45M | $2.68M |
| Holders | — | 3,967 |
| Age (days) | 28 | 149 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- XAUG measures ~2.2× the 24h volume of PROS
- over the shared window XAUG moved −8.23% while PROS moved +5.41%
What the data says
XAUG
XAUG on Base — 0x08c5dd8b64ec620aa31914bba13984b57e40c30b — trades as "Lydia Gold" at $4,319.45, a price that tracks the spot ounce of gold almost exactly. Three days old in the October 9, 2026 snapshot: $587 thousand of liquidity, roughly $2.2 million of daily volume.
The XAU-prefixed ticker borrows the commodity code for gold, and the comparison it invites is XAUT — Tether's established tokenized gold. Lydia Gold is not that. The name, the price-pegging to spot, and the XAU prefix describe a commodity wrapper claim; whether any vaulted gold backs it is, as with every tokenized commodity, an off-chain question of issuer attestations that no pool figure can verify. The three-day age is the load-bearing fact: this is a brand-new instrument asking for commodity-grade trust.
PROS
PROS — Wrapped PROS on Base, 0x8b7dde054be9d180c1be7fae0874697374a49832 — is the wrapped form of a token with a real home elsewhere: PROS is the Prosper/Prosper-predict ecosystem token, and a wrapped ERC-20 on Base is the cross-chain form of it. The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $570 thousand of liquidity and roughly $2.7 million of daily volume.
A wrapped token's risk model differs from a native one: the honest questions are which bridge or custodian mints the wrapper, whether the canonical contract is the one at this address, and what the redemption path back to the native asset looks like. $0.44 per token across 103 days of tracked age describes a wrapper with a sustained market — the depth to trade, and the standing caveat that wrapper integrity is only as good as its bridge.
FAQ
Which is bigger, XAUG or PROS?
By tracked market cap: XAUG (Base) measures — and PROS (Base) measures $2.69M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, XAUG or PROS?
On the contract checks we publish: XAUG (Base) grades B and PROS (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have XAUG and PROS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show XAUG at −8.23% and PROS at +5.41%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.